- Shifting Focus
- Posts
- How to be direct without hurting people
How to be direct without hurting people
What I've learned about delivering bad news as an attorney

Hi there,
You need to tell someone something hard, and you're terrified.
Maybe it's your partner. Maybe it's a friend. Maybe it's someone at work.
But you know if you say what you're actually thinking, you might damage the relationship. So you soften it. You dance around it and bury the lead.
Then it backfires anyway.
I watched this happen with a friend recently. She knew her three-year relationship wasn't working. But instead of just coming out and saying it, she hinted at it. She complained. She dropped breadcrumbs he couldn't follow.
Six months of this, and when she finally said "I want to break up," he felt blindsided.
The damage wasn’t the breakup itself. It was the months of avoidance and uncertainty they both endured when they could’ve been living with clarity and forward movement.
Radical Transparency
Having a tendency to be a people-pleaser, I’ve had to learn to be direct. Early in my career, I worked at a company with a radical culture of truth-telling. The founder believed in what Ray Dalio calls "radical transparency". It’s the idea that you can't build anything meaningful if people are afraid to speak the truth.
So the rule was simple: no hedging, no softening, just the straightforward truth.
At that company, if your boss gave you feedback, it was direct. If your idea wasn't working, someone would tell you. If your presentation was weak, you'd hear about it.
No one was doing it to be cruel. But the company's success depended on everyone knowing reality, not a softened version of it.
It was definitely uncomfortable at times. People clashed. But something incredible happened: everyone got better. Fast.
Because when you know people are going to be honest with you, you can actually improve. You're not guessing what went wrong.
That's what Dalio figured out. Directness isn't cruelty if it's paired with genuine care for someone's growth.
Being Kind v. Being Nice
As a trial lawyer I learned the same lesson all over again, this time with much higher stakes.
When a client comes in and I have to say "you don't have a case," I could soften it. I could build context. I could dance around it. Most people do.
But I learned early: don't soften it. Just use the front door and get straight to the point.
Because there's a massive difference between being nice and being kind.
Nice is "I can't tell them that." It protects you from discomfort.
Kind is "I care enough to tell them the truth." It protects them from uncertainty.
Most people choose to be nice.
Punch v. Flicks
The irony is that by choosing nice, they make the conversation worse because they extend the part that actually hurts.
Direct news feels like a punch. But it's actually just a flick.
Think about it: when someone says "we need to talk" and then takes ten minutes to get to the point, your stomach is in knots the entire time. That entire time in lead up that’s spent anticipating and bracing for impact is the punch. The actual news, when it finally lands, is almost a relief by comparison. That's the flick.
The long lead-up is what hurts people. Not the truth itself.
I learned this the hard way when I managed a large team. Annual reviews would roll around, and I'd find myself dancing around tough conversations about raises.
I’d say: "As you know, the economy has been rough this year. The company had a difficult quarter. We've had to make some cost-cutting decisions, and unfortunately…" I thought I was softening the blow. But I was actually drawing it out.
I could see the dread building with every word. By the time I finally said "there's no raise this year," they were exhausted and drained by the build-up and anticipation.
So the next year, I stopped protecting myself and started respecting them. I cut the lead-up entirely.
I'd open with: "I want to be direct with you. There's no raise this year. I know that's hard to hear. Let me explain why..."
The reaction was completely different. People were disappointed, sure. But they weren't ambushed. They could absorb the news, ask real questions, and move forward.
The flick stung. The long lead up to the punch was painful, long, and unbearable. Think of it like ripping off a band-aid, the faster you do it, the less pain you feel.
“Clear is kind. Unclear is unkind.”
How to Deliver Bad News
The actual truth delivered straight is just information. And information, even bad news, can be dealt with over the uncertainty of not knowing.
Here's the framework I use:
1. Use the front door. No hedging. No context-building. "I want to be direct with you. Here's what I need to tell you."
2. Say it straight. Just the truth. The flick, not the punch.
3. Pause. Let it land. The silence is where they absorb it.
4. Acknowledge the feeling. Don't argue with it. Don't try to fix it. Just say: "I know this isn't what you wanted. I can understand how you feel."
5. Move toward what's next. "Here's what we can do instead." Give them agency back.
The key in all of this is that empathy comes after you've told the truth, not before. And it comes without trying to soften what you just said.
You're not saying "but it might be okay." You're saying "I see you, and I'm here."
That's the difference. That's what actually keeps relationships intact.
When you're nice, you extend the lead-up. You beat around the bush. People spend weeks or months in uncertainty, filling the silence with hope that will die anyway.
When you're kind, you're direct. The news lands fast. It stings. Then you acknowledge they're stinging. Then you move forward together.
One damages relationships and often makes things worse. The other lets them deal with the reality of the situation and move on.
The next time you're tempted to soften something, ask yourself: Am I being nice, or am I being kind?
Nice protects you. Kind protects them.
Go for kindness,
Shakila

Reply